You are here

Keep Our Libraries Open 3



Email not looking beautiful? View it in your browser
keep our libraries open...
Vol 1 Issue 3 September 2011
Make a difference
A local view...

In a lifetime, most of us are offered a chance or two to do something that may make a difference in the lives of our families and our neighbors.  We don’t always recognize the opportunity when it comes. Sometimes the task is too great or the time is wrong. Other times we step up and say, “I’ll help.”

Such a time is now.

It is time to do your part, whether large or small, and work to keep libraries open in Canyonville, Drain, Glendale, Myrtle Creek, Oakland, Reedsport, Riddle, Roseburg, Sutherlin, Winston and Yoncalla. Every free, public library in Douglas County risks closure July 1, 2012, if the federal Safety Net is not extended. Even if it is, the extension will not likely be a permanent source of funds for our county.

The first task is to be sure that everyone who cares about the libraries knows that the libraries may disappear. This may mean that you talk to people you know and explain the threat. You might put a library bumper sticker on your car or write a letter to the editor of your paper. You might join a group of other library supporters and do a bit more to get the word out. Perhaps you’ll donate money, time, or materials to raise money for a campaign.

The second task is to register to vote people who support libraries. The third is to remind supporters to vote.

Are free, public libraries worth your time? I think they are. I hope you do, too


"A town without a library is a town without a future."
- Dan Jocoy
Mayor of Myrtle Creek, Oregon



Authors on Libraries

You're a citizen of that great democratic space that opens up between you and the book. And the body that gave it to you is the public library. - Phiip Pullman


Image

DC Library in the News

The News-Review - NRtoday.com
Umpqua Post - theumpquapost.com


News Review - Douglas County libraries push funding proposal - Ryan Imondi - Oct 05, 2011

Umpqua Post - Library funding and hours dwindle each year - Lori Newman -  Oct 5, 2011

Umpqua Post - Committee forms to explore future revenue options -
Lori Newman -  Oct 5, 2011

Editorial: City councils should give residents right to vote - Oct 2, 2011

Opinion - Help needed to save county libraries - Robert Leo Heilman - Sept 30. 2011
 

Staff Column: Librarian's departure opens another chapter in staff shortages - Brittany Ann Arnold - Sept 30, 2011

Guest Column: Libraries provide means to improve lives - Diane Williams - August 24, 2011

Letter to the editor: Library services are irreplaceable - Eliza Dove - July 5, 2011

Guest Column: Libraries are the beating hearts of rural communities - Diane Williams - June 22, 2011

Staff Column: Not so quick on cuts to library services- Bill Duncan - June 9, 2011

Editorial: Visiting speaker a literary treat for Douglas County - May 18, 2011

Residents ask to save library hours  - May 5, 2011

Energy Spotlight: Library, UCAN open chapter on energy savings - Jim Long - April 3, 2011

Editorial: Library inspiring new readers — one word at a time - March 10, 2011

Read all about it: Douglas County Library system among the best - March 3, 2011

Guest Column: Let's pay up to save our libraries - Robert Leo Heilman - Feb 16, 2011

Douglas County Library supporters propose tax district funding - Feb 8 2011

Editorial: Libraries offer much more than stacks of books - Sept 3, 2010

Douglas County Library system to face further budget cuts - Aug 22 2010
 


Who We are...


 
SHARE THIS EMAIL

The Safety Net will Save Us Again?

by R.M. Bell
rmackbell1943@gmail.com


For the last several years it has been almost impossible to live in Douglas County tightropewithout hearing about the "Safety Net" However, like most of us, I didn't really understand what the "Safety Net" was and has been. I did know it was federal money that the county received from the government to make-up for not being able to tax federally owned land. I knew it was to be used for schools and roads but I didn't understand how its renewal, proposed in the president's budget, could help save the library system.  So I did some research.

Though it is often referred to as the "Safety Net", the full name of the law is the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (2000). Before 2000, Douglas County had been compensated for the loss of property taxes by receiving a share of the reciepts from timber harvested from federal lands within its borders. Since 50% percent of the county is a patch work of federal land, the county had received adequate dollars from these timber sales to maintain, schools, roads, and other county services. (1908 - 2011 timeline here) However, with the decline in federal timber harvesting, it became clear that the county needed additional reimbursement for the non-taxed federal lands to maintain adequate county services. So in 2000 the Safety Net was initiated with a seven (7) year duration. Seven years later, in 2007, the act was re-authorized for four (4) more years but this time the amount the county received was set to decrease each year - to "step down" - and at the end of the fourth year, the "Safety Net" funding would stop. This year is the last year of the 2007 authorization and unless it is re-authorized the county will receive only the meager amount from the diminished logging on federal lands. Commisioner Susan Morgan wrote a clear explanation of what this will mean to future county services in her "The Budget Box Encore". It's not a pretty picture. But what happens if the Safety Net is re-authorized? Will this fix our county's money problems? Are we just crying wolf?
The short answer is yes and no. Yes the reauthorization would temporarily  shore up the county budget but no one is crying wolf.

Just as in the re-authorization of 2007, the presidents proposed authorization would extend the "Safety Net" for another four (4) years. Once again the amount will "step down" until by 2015 there will again be no funding. The big difference between the 2007 and the 2012 Safety Net is the amount of the beginning funds. This time the funding would likely start at the 2011 level. As we have seen, this level of funding has required that the county departments drastically trim their budgets. The Douglas County Library System cut library staffing, reduced open hours at all branches, and stopped using county funds for purchasing new books and other materials. Many of us in the community believe that the current (2011) library budget is now less than needed to fund the library system. So even if the Safety Net is re-authorized at the proposed amounts, it is probable that, by the end of 2013, the library system will once again be threatened with closing.

It appears to me that the proposed  "Safety Net" re-authorization is not a solution but just another postponement.

 

At Your Service

by Robert Leo Heilman
bdheilman@mbol.us

Author of Overstory: Zero:  
Real Life in Timber Country

 

I was delighted to hear that Carol Hildebrand had been named “Educator of the Year”
at the annual Citizen of the Year banquet. I’ve known her for nearly thirty years now in
our small-town way, and the good news first struck me as both a well-deserved honor
and an unexpected one.

Carol is a librarian who presides over the Canyonville Public Library, and though she is
not a teacher or professor I saw immediately the justice of the award. She spends her work-
ing days helping people, in a dozen ways, to get the knowledge that drew them to her small
section of city hall. It is heartening to watch her patient and skillful work in greeting the
patrons—taking the time to listen to their worries and hopes, their joys and sorrows – and
always providing gentle suggestions for sources of further information or amusement.

It was only later that I remembered the cuts. At the moment when Carol was being
honored, her library was facing a severe budget cut. A few months later the Canyonville
Public Library lost six of its twenty-two open-door hours—a major loss not just in library
service but also to the well-being of the town.

Getting people to understand the great social value of our free public libraries has be-
come increasingly difficult over the past twenty years. I have heard it argued that maintaining
a library at public expense is a waste of tax revenue in this age of easy internet access. This
line of reasoning always seems to come from people who are perfectly able to pay the small
necessary annual tax, and who haven’t actually set foot in a public library for several years.
If a public library were a mere tool, like a screwdriver, a dictionary or the internet, such talk would be reasonable. Fortunately, our free public libraries are much more than that.

Both the internet and the library are sources of information. The difference is that the
virtual help offered by the worldwide web is impersonal, while libraries have librarians.
When you walk in the door of your local public library, there is someone there who is ready
to help you. Librarians aren’t there to run a scam on you, nor to try to turn a profit, nor
to deceive you—all common enough occurrences in this, the so-called “information age.”
A librarian is more than just a specialist but rather a sort of friend to one and all, someone
with nothing more than your own good at heart.

We live in an age of epidemic loneliness. Along with our gadgets and our wealth have
come increasing isolation and alienation. Our virtual magic carpets have whisked us off to il-
lusory worlds with much to delight the eye and the intellect but nothing to please our hearts.
I have often, over the years, thought of our free public libraries as temples of knowledge. It is
only lately that I have come to understand that they are temples of compassion as well.

The creation of free public libraries is, in itself, a compassionate act. Properly under-
stood, compassion is a matter of acknowledging that others are equal to us; and therefore
they are deserving of the same respect and kindly assistance that we would accord ourselves.
Compassion is an essentially egalitarian approach to living and our free public libraries first came about as a way to extend that personal compassion to entire communities. A public
library is one of the few places that I know of where I am always treated with real respect, as
an equal rather than as a mere consumer or client, patient or employee.

I am, I admit, quite fond of librarians. Alone among the professional classes, they have
consistently earned my admiration throughout my life. I have lived long enough at the bot-
tom of the societal heap to have seen oppression in both its gross and petty forms and to have
learned from it a deep-seated distrust of the credentialed products of what passes for “higher
education” in our society. It has often struck me that “the evil that men do” in these modern
days is mostly done by those who hold advanced college degrees. Yet, when I contemplate
the horrible mediocrity of our mass culture and the terrible pain brought to so many through
their inescapable poverty and through the cold-blooded ill treatment that is their daily share, it comes to me that librarians, at least, are consistently creative and helpful people.

We seldom fully know the full worth of the good we do. A kind word or an off-hand
suggestion at the right time can often save a life or launch a useful career. The people we
meet in our daily lives remain largely mysterious to us. A stranger met once may never be
met again and yet the memory of that meeting may affect his or her life or our own for
decades afterward, perhaps enriching a life or two or thousands of other lives. The front
desk of a public library is not just a place where such things can happen. It is a place whose
purpose is to make sure that it will happen—repeatedly and “for the common good.”

The premise underlying free public libraries is neither liberal nor conservative. It is,
however, an American premise: that all of us need to have an equal opportunity to educate
ourselves. I like to think of libraries as both the university of the poor and the place where
the truly educated go to continue to learn. It is obvious that an education through a process
which aims at obtaining accreditation is a very inferior sort of education, one that at best
prepares us to learn on our own. And where but in a public library can a thorough lifelong
education take place free of charge and assisted by a kindly neighbor?

It is distressing that we live in a radically libertarian age of rampant tightwadism, and
sad that our free public libraries should be closed because of “bottom line” small-minded-
ness. Must all the public good that can’t be expressed by strings of digits and displayed on
a spreadsheet lose public funding? Have we, as a society, concluded at last that we must
abandon generosity and compassion in order to prosper? Not so very long ago these were
said to be the essential ingredients in the humane glue that holds us together as a nation and
as a people.

At Your Service was originally published in the OLA Quarterly Archive - Volume 17
Download the entire publication here:

http://data.memberclicks.com/site/ola/olaq_17no3.pdf
 


 
 
You received this email because at some point in the past you  signed up to our mailing list, or gave us permission to send this to your account. If you'd like, you can unsubscribe.

 

 

 

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer